<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Born a Doubter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=born-a-doubter</link>
	<description>thoughts from someone dealing with doubt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lefers</title>
		<link>http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lefers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=333#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Tim,
Thanks for the excellent quote. I highlighted it as a separate post &lt;a href=&quot;http://christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; because I wanted to draw attention to it for others who are in a similar boat as me. Andrew Peabody makes a good distinction between these two types of skepticism and its important to understand what type of skepticism one practices. I too hope that I will someday soon come to that settled faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
Thanks for the excellent quote. I highlighted it as a separate post <a href="http://christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/" rel="nofollow">here</a> because I wanted to draw attention to it for others who are in a similar boat as me. Andrew Peabody makes a good distinction between these two types of skepticism and its important to understand what type of skepticism one practices. I too hope that I will someday soon come to that settled faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=333#comment-365</guid>
		<description>That reminds me of a wonderful quotation from Andrew P. Peabody, &lt;i&gt;Christianity and Science&lt;/i&gt; (New York: Robert Carter and Brothers, 1874), pp. 250-51:

&quot;There are two kinds of scepticism,—that of the heart and that of the intellect. The former is adapted to make unbelievers; the latter, to make Christians. The fomer will not look at the hands and the side, because it is determined not to be moved morally and spiritually as they would move the honest soul; the latter insists on seeing the wound-marks, because it wants to know the precise truth, and therefore avails itself of whatever evidence God has given. The scepticism of the heart hates the light, and will not come to the light, lest its deeds be reproved. The scepticism of the mind is that which cannot believe without sufficient evidence. It proves all things, and holds fast that which will stand the test. It examines both sides of a question, and adheres to that which imposes the least strain on its belief. Such a mind needs only to have the evidences of Christianity fairly presented, to yield to it entire and cordial faith. Many of the firmest believers, many of the ablest defenders of the truth as it is in Jesus, belong to this class of minds. In this sense, Lardner, Paley, and Butler, whose contributions to the Christian evidences are invaluable, and will be so for generations to come, were pre-eminently sceptics. They would not believe, without examining the hands and the side, trying all the witnesses, testing the objections against Christianity with the opposing arguments, weighing coolly and impartially the evidence, real or pretended, on either side; and the result was a faith in Christ, which sight could hardly have rendered clearer or stronger.

&quot;God has made many such minds, and they are among the noblest and best of his creation.&quot;

I hope that you will come to that settled faith in the course of honest seeking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me of a wonderful quotation from Andrew P. Peabody, <i>Christianity and Science</i> (New York: Robert Carter and Brothers, 1874), pp. 250-51:</p>
<p>&#8220;There are two kinds of scepticism,—that of the heart and that of the intellect. The former is adapted to make unbelievers; the latter, to make Christians. The fomer will not look at the hands and the side, because it is determined not to be moved morally and spiritually as they would move the honest soul; the latter insists on seeing the wound-marks, because it wants to know the precise truth, and therefore avails itself of whatever evidence God has given. The scepticism of the heart hates the light, and will not come to the light, lest its deeds be reproved. The scepticism of the mind is that which cannot believe without sufficient evidence. It proves all things, and holds fast that which will stand the test. It examines both sides of a question, and adheres to that which imposes the least strain on its belief. Such a mind needs only to have the evidences of Christianity fairly presented, to yield to it entire and cordial faith. Many of the firmest believers, many of the ablest defenders of the truth as it is in Jesus, belong to this class of minds. In this sense, Lardner, Paley, and Butler, whose contributions to the Christian evidences are invaluable, and will be so for generations to come, were pre-eminently sceptics. They would not believe, without examining the hands and the side, trying all the witnesses, testing the objections against Christianity with the opposing arguments, weighing coolly and impartially the evidence, real or pretended, on either side; and the result was a faith in Christ, which sight could hardly have rendered clearer or stronger.</p>
<p>&#8220;God has made many such minds, and they are among the noblest and best of his creation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope that you will come to that settled faith in the course of honest seeking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lefers</title>
		<link>http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lefers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=333#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Reto,
What good news that you have found a break from your doubts. Thanks for the link to Pensées. Blaise was definitely a smart guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reto,<br />
What good news that you have found a break from your doubts. Thanks for the link to Pensées. Blaise was definitely a smart guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reto</title>
		<link>http://christiandoubt.com/2009/08/31/born-a-doubter/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Reto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=333#comment-362</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wandering the roads of doubt again for some time now.
Recently Blaise Pascal had a big impact on my thinking. I&#039;m reading his &quot;Pensées&quot; (http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/18269).
He was a bright mind. I&#039;m seeing Christianity in a different light now. I have hope again. Hope in eternal life. What else do I need?

God Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wandering the roads of doubt again for some time now.<br />
Recently Blaise Pascal had a big impact on my thinking. I&#8217;m reading his &#8220;Pensées&#8221; (<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/18269" rel="nofollow">http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/18269</a>).<br />
He was a bright mind. I&#8217;m seeing Christianity in a different light now. I have hope again. Hope in eternal life. What else do I need?</p>
<p>God Bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
